I found these two chapters very interesting, but a little technical on a poetic artform that is meant to be free of will. When you hear saper describe the different types of poetry it makes it less appealing to me, when you look at the works of nico without the commentary of saper i find it a whole lot more enjoyable, this si why there are so many poetic forms today for the same reason that there are so many religions and sects of religions, because the second somone describes a process it becomes part of the Society and once that has happened the life and counter activism that was apparently in all of these movements disappears and i find it kind of sad that critique has ruined a lot of good ideas for bureaucratic artwork, it is the knife that chopped the chickens head off, the artwork might continue for a little bit but pretty much it loses its heart head connection which i believe poetry is all about regardless of wether its your unconscious mind or conscious mind. Basically the it has become completly reactionary which can be good in some cases and bad in others. I REALLY enjoyed nicos work though because i looked at it before i read the chapters in saper and i found them visually challenging i wasted probably like three hours going through the visual work and then rushed through the written work but i love his written work a lot to, it was just easier to understand. especially the line Minimalism is alright
but death’s
extravagant

and also

No one wants to be lonely. Makes noise to stop the silence.
The magnet. He feeds on eyes. It’s horrible. A palsied runt. A smidge of
disbelief. That locale you know will bring relief.
Despite none of these being relevant to the other parts of the poem

I dont even know if this was part of the reading but i found it very intresting, and honestly i dont like saper's over analized Critique im sorry but i dislike when someone tries to simplify something that is from another persons heart i dont even know why people critique poetry of this type because the whole idea is that basically its under critique, because if you have to critique it you dont understand it.